Chances are, you've never setup a Real Time Location System (RTLS). Convergence Systems Limited claims that their CS5000 series RTLS achieves one (1) meter accuracy and can be setup in under an hour, all for less than $5,000. Based on what our team has seen with other real time location systems, we are extremely skeptical. In this edition of The RFID Network we’re going setup, and test, an RTLS.
![]() ![]() Product Rating: ![]() Best-in-Class Award
|
The CSL CS5000 won the The RFID Network 2011 Best in Class award for Real Time Location Systems.
A Real Time Location Systems or RTLS typically refers to a collection of sensors that work together to automatically identify and track the location of objects (including people) in real time. The CSL RTLS is comprised of the following (click on any of the below links for specifications and technical data sheet):
Readers, also referred to as anchors, perform ranging and provide a known location reference point for tags. There are master anchors and slave anchors. In April, 2011, CSL introduced two new models of anchors for 180° and 360° ranging.
Master readers / anchors perform tag ranging and transfers all the ranging data collected by the slave anchors back to the server running the location engine software. It is connected to DC power and and Ethernet port or to a Power Over Ethernet (PoE) port alone. There are three models (click below for product data sheets):
Slave readers / anchors performs tag ranging and communicate wirelessly with the master anchor. Only DC power is required. There are three models (click below for product data sheets):
Asset Tags (CS3151-AAA Active Tag)
Personnel Wrist Tags (CS3151BB2 Active Tag)
RTLS Module for RFID handheld (model #CS506) this optional module allows the CS101 handheld to be tracked using the CS5000 RTLS and can combine position coordinates with passive (ISO-180006C/ EPCglobal Class 1, Generation 2) RFID tag data.
In this video, our team sets up and tests an RTLS Starter Kit which includes the following components:
For the indoor tests, we add an additional two (2) CS5111LP slave reader/anchor units.
In April, 2011, we evaluated the RTLS again using 180° and 360° anchors, as well as the updated location engine software. Additionally, the output power has been doubled compared to the original anchors, which allows better penetration in complicated environment, such as our indoor environment. The maximum number of anchors per cell has been increased from 8 to 256 and is now capable of tracking up to 65,000 unique tags. Using the portfolio of anchors, and these enhancements, significantly larger areas can be covered. Here the configuration tested that covers 900x600 meters:
What's not included in the starter kit, but highly recommended by The RFID Network:
The CSL CS5000 operates in 2400 – 2483 MHz ISM license-free band and uses True Time-Of-Arrival (TOA) for location determination. There are a two common alternative methods used to determine location in other RTLS and active RFID systems: Received Signal Strength Index (RSSI) and Time Difference Of Arrival (TDOA), which we explain in the article: Wi-Fi ID: How it Works. The primary benefits to a TOA based location system are:

As Dr. Lai states in the video, the location engine uses simple TOA algorithms, which transform the raw data from the anchors into X, Y location coordinates. The terms most often used to describe this process of transforming the raw data into location data is "triangulation" or "trilateration". "Tri" referring to three because if the raw data from at least three points is known, then the intersection of the three circles around the access point can yield the location of the tag and hence the object the tag is affixed to. The problem with simple triangulation is when a signal is blocked or reflected - position accuracy can be seriously degraded or becomes impossible to determine. CSL compensates for this by greatly improving upon a simple triangulation process, which we explain in the box below. Fair warning: it's a little technical.
The location engine software is included with the hardware at no additional cost. This is extremely price disruptive to the market as other RTLS vendors charge a software license that can cost between $5,000 and $50,000, not including ANY hardware. This makes the system feasible for applications where current RTLS offerings are cost prohibitive.
A demo application (pictured below) is included for educating and demonstrating the capabilities of the RTLS. CSL provides the full source code, which is written in C# with Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 (also included).
The demo software allows you to overlay a floorplan image which makes it easier to find tagged assets, and tagged personnel, relative to rooms, shelves, and other objects (pictured below).

The CSL RTLS system allows you to define geographical areas, called cells, where tagged items are tracked. Each cell is bordered by at least 4 anchors, in most cases 6, and up to 8 in challenging environments such as our indoor warehouse testing environment. The maximum area of a cell is100m x 100m. Larger areas can be segregated into multiple cells.

To optimize the performance of the RTLS even more, there are a number of automated tools in the demo application. These include:
There are also additional tools for automatic diagnostics and setup optimization.
All of the anchors are IP67 rated so they can be installed outdoors. Setting up the RTLS in our open, outdoor environment was extremely simple. In the accompanying video, we go through the entire process. Start with the master anchor and connect it to power and Ethernet. The demo software located the master anchor on the network without any problem. Each of the the slave anchors was connected to power and we ensured they had a strong communication signal with the master anchor. The distance between the anchors is measured using a laser distance meter and then entered into the demo software. We introduced tags into the read field and started reading immediately. It actually took longer to unpack the equipment (40 minutes) than it did to setup and start reading tags. Our initial accuracy was improved upon as we went through the performance optimization process tools described above. Ultimately, we achieved approximately one meter of accuracy in our outdoor test environment.
Setting up the RTLS in our indoor environment was more difficult because we selected a busy area with a lot of people, products, metal shelves, and equipment. The floorplan is shown to the right and photos are below.
The process was the same as we just described except we elected to add two additional anchors because the environment was so cluttered. Ultimately, we achieved approximately two meters of accuracy in our indoor test environment.


The CS3151-AAA is an IP68 rated asset tag that uses three (3) AAA batteries, either:
AAA batteries are extremely common and easily replaced. Like all active tags, the life of the battery depends on the usage. For a real time tracking where the tag is always moving, tag battery life will be shorter than applications where the tags only transmit when they are moved or at a shorter, predefined interval. CSL publishes their tag life as follows using the 1250 mAh AAA Alkaline batteries from Energizer:
![]() Subject Matter Expert Rod Saunders talks about his experiences implementing 802.11 Wi-Fi and Time of Arrival (TOA) based real time location systems, including:
|
![]() The Dallas Zoo's award-winning Giants of the Savanna exhibit is using RTLS technology to track the movement of the elephants. Read the full story: |
| ©2002-2012 The RFID Network | Site Map | About Us | Advertise with Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | RFID News | Login | Interviews | e-Newsletter Editions | Subscribe |
Comments
This product’s accuracy is impressive for the 2.4 GHz band. It uses Chirp spread spectrum which is great for location determination because it provides a very stable and accurate Time of Travel. Chirp was championed by Nanotron but abandoned as an alternative PHY for IEEE standard 802.15.4a precision ranging.
A trained indoor RSSI can usually provide (5-10m) for much less than TOA since line of sight is not required. But where accuracy is important, I agree TOA is best and that chirp is an excellent way to do it in the 2.4 band. It's liable to be much more accurate than the DSSS of Wifi by itself.
Just be aware that the accuracy of any TOA system will suffer once LOS is lost. This product would be well suited for a factory environment. If anyone needs a good eye to evaluate it, look me up. :-)
RSS feed for comments to this post