The purpose of these tests is to determine how well an RFID tag performs in real-world supply chain logistics operations. More specifically, evaluate the ability of each RFID tag to be read when passing through a fixed portal or scanned with a handheld RFID reader.
During the tests the environmental conditions measured an ambient temperature of 72.1°F (22.3°C) and ambient humidity of 32 percent.
Assets / Containers Used
Three different assets / container types were used:
Military Ammunition |
Beer Kegs |
Wooden Containers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
The tags are placed in various locations including:
These combinations allow us to obtain a more accurate representation of how the RFID tags are used in actual operations.
Configuration of Single and Double Layer Mixed Pallets
The assets / containers were erected into three different mixed pallets configurations each with the RFID tags placed in different locations:

The fixed portal was constructed to represent a reasonable and customary single-sided dock door configuration. Although many implementations use antennas on both sides of the portal, our team elected to use a single-sided portal for a worse-case-scenario. As shown in the picture (right) there is also acoustic absorbing material behind the antennas to prevent possible reflections that result faux-improved performance.
Our test team used an Alien ALR9800 reader with two 6dbi Alien circular polarized antennas mounted at 24- and 48-inch heights. In relation to the above pallet configuration diagrams, the RFID antennas are mounted to the left. See above image
The Alien reader firmware was the latest available as of date of testing. Reader transmission power was attenuated to 29dB.
Each pallet configuration was passed through the fixed portal, by use of a pallet jack, 100 times, for a total of 300 portal passes per tag. Remember, multiple tags are tested. When a tag is read during a portal pass, it counts as a successful read. The average travel time through the portal is between 19 and 20 seconds.
For each test, the team captured two metrics:
Average # of Successful Reads
This is the average number of times the tag was read when going through the portal.
Average Number of Interrogations per Successful Read
This number is important because it indicates how strong the RFID tag responds to the reader when being read. The higher the number of interrogations per successful read, the better the performance.
The Average Read Percentage is calculated.
RFID Enabled Portal with Mixed Pallet Configuration 1
Manufacturer / |
Average # of Successful Reads |
Average |
Average number of interrogations per successful read |
|
49 |
48.67% |
2.81 |
90 |
89.50% |
2.29 |
|
100 |
100.00% |
9.08 |
|
98 |
98.33% |
9.08 |
|
100 |
100.00% |
9.71 |
|
100 |
100.00% |
15.35 |
RFID Enabled Portal with Mixed Pallet Configuration 2
Manufacturer / |
Average # of Successful Reads |
Average |
Average number of interrogations per successful read |
|
98 |
98.67% |
3.47 |
23 |
23.00% |
1.22 |
|
100 |
100.00% |
6.43 |
|
100 |
99.67%¹ |
8.88 |
|
100 |
100.00% |
7.24 |
|
100 |
100.00% |
13.28 |
¹ This is due to the average across multiple tag tests. One tag was missed in over 900 tag read opportunities.
RFID Enabled Portal with Mixed Pallet Configuration 3
Manufacturer / |
Average # of Successful Reads |
Average |
Average number of interrogations per successful read |
|
98 |
98.67% |
5.87 |
94 |
94.00% |
3.25 |
|
100 |
100.00% |
6.08 |
|
100 |
100.00% |
11.69 |
|
100 |
100.00% |
8.92 |
|
100 |
100.00% |
14.23 |
RFID Enabled Portal Cumulative Results with All Mixed Pallet Configurations
Manufacturer / |
Cumulative |
Cumulative Average number of interrogations per successful read |
|
82.00% |
4.05 |
68.83% |
2.25 |
|
100.00% |
5.66 |
|
99.33% |
9.88 |
|
100% |
8.62 |
|
100% |
14.29 |
For these tests, our team used an Intermec CN3e Handheld Reader with IP30 add-on passive UHF RFID handle. The firmware was the latest available as of date of testing.
The handheld reader was used at a distance of 6 feet perpendicular to the length of the test pallet. Each pallet configuration was scanned using the handheld reader 50 times, for a total of 150 handheld reader scans.
Manufacturer / |
Mixed Pallet Configuration 1 |
Mixed Pallet Configuration 1 |
Mixed Pallet Configuration 1 |
Cumulative Results |
|
50/50 |
48/50 |
47/50 |
96% |
40/50 |
39/50 |
35/50 |
76% |
|
50/50 |
50/50 |
50/50 |
100% |
|
50/50 |
47/50 |
40/50 |
91% |
|
50/50 |
49/50 |
47/50 |
97% |
|
50/50 |
50/50 |
50/50 |
100% |
Durable Asset Tag Benchmark Table of Contents
Introduction, Defining 'Durability' and the RFID Tags Evaluated
Vibration Survival Tests
Supply Chain Logistics Operations Tests: Mixed Pallets with an RFID Enabled Portal & Handheld RFID Reader
Asset Tracking Tests: Maximum Read Range Outdoors with a GPS enabled Handheld RFID Reader
Manufacturing Work-In-Progress Tests: Maximum Read Range Indoors with a Fixed Position RFID Reader
Overall Benchmark Test Analysis
Important Considerations When Selecting RFID Tags
| ©2002-2012 The RFID Network | Site Map | About Us | Advertise with Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | RFID News | Login | Interviews | e-Newsletter Editions | Subscribe |